Young people most likely to report being scammed amid dramatic rise in fraud, Which? finds

People aged between 20 and 39 are the most likely to have reported being scammed in the past year, Which? research reveals, with many young victims losing huge sums of money to online shopping scams, pyramid schemes and rental fraud.

Which?’s analysis found that between November 2020 and December 2021, individual victims lodged a total of 448,838 fraud reports with Action Fraud. More than £1.9 billion was lost by victims as a result.

A recent Office for National Statistics (ONS) report also revealed that an estimated 5.1 million fraud offences were committed in England and Wales in the year to September 2021 – up 36 per cent in two years. It means that fraud now accounts for 40 per cent of all crimes recorded.

It is often assumed that older people are more vulnerable to fraud, but Which? found that those aged 20 to 39 were the most likely to report being scammed – accounting for two in five (39%) of all reports to Action Fraud.

Which? identified 12 emerging fraud threats and found that three quarters (74%) of rental fraud cases were reported by young people (20-39). This is where victims are tricked into paying upfront fees to secure properties by fake landlords and letting agents.

Jonny Yeoman, 27, told Which? he was conned out of £2,500 after being tricked into paying a deposit to a fake landlord to secure a rental property.

The victim saw the flat advertised on Gumtree with a link to SpareRoom, and received a message from who he thought was the landlord. The scammer then convinced Jonny to set up a viewing at the property with legitimate estate agents.

After viewing the flat, Jonny checked the Land Registry to verify the property landlord’s name and decided to put down a deposit. But when he tried to move in, the real landlord’s daughter answered the door and said they had no knowledge of the rental agreement and realised the landlord’s email was fake.

The victim reported the scam to Action Fraud and the recipient bank of the deposit, which was able to recover almost all of the money lost.

Those aged between 20 and 39 were also more likely to report pyramid or Ponzi schemes (57%) and online shopping scams (55%) than other age groups.

Meanwhile, people aged 60 to 79 made up one in five (20%) of all fraud reports. This age group makes up the highest proportion of reports for computer fixing fraud (47%), recovery fraud (38%), and ‘419’ advance fee fraud (37%).

Online shopping scams and auction fraud were easily the most reported type of fraud overall, where victims pay for goods on an online marketplace that do not arrive, or do not receive payments for goods they have sold. These scams make up a quarter (23%) of reports.

Investment fraud is responsible for the biggest losses, with the average victim losing more than £50,400 to pyramid or Ponzi schemes – reports were up 59 per cent on last year according to the ONS. These scams involve recruiting friends or family (pyramid) or paying returns to early investors to gain credibility (Ponzi).

Victims also lost £25,000 on average to share sales or boiler room scams (reports up 57%), and £24,000 to other investment scams such as cryptocurrency (reports up 34%). Action Fraud told Which? that it received 9,458 reports referring to cryptocurrency in 2021, with total losses of £204.5 million, or £21,620 per report.

Many scams originate online via phishing emails or rogue adverts on search engines and social media, directing you to fake investment comparison websites or websites cloning regulated firms.

Sham investment firms often pretend to be backed by celebrities or social media ‘influencers’ and will even create fake news articles that appear to endorse them.

While the UK is facing a fraud crisis, the government has finally taken action to tackle online scam adverts. After years of Which? campaigning, the government recently announced that it would include paid-for advertising in the Online Safety Bill to help tackle an epidemic of scams gripping society.

The Bill must now ensure that the regulator has the support and resources it needs to hold companies to account and take strong enforcement action where necessary, so that fraudsters are prevented from using adverts to lure unsuspecting victims.

Five years on from Which?’s super-complaint on bank transfer scams, the government also committed to legislate so it will be mandatory for firms to reimburse victims.

The consumer champion is urging the government to swiftly introduce the right legislation on bank transfer fraud, as Which? has repeatedly found evidence of unfair and inconsistent treatment of victims despite the introduction of a voluntary bank code designed to protect them.

Jenny Ross, Which? Money Editor, said:

“Fraudsters don’t discriminate when it comes to scams and everyone is susceptible to these growing numbers of crimes, with many young victims being tricked into losing life-changing sums of money.

“The government’s decision to include paid-for scam adverts in the Online Safety Bill, along with promises to make reimbursement mandatory for bank transfer scam victims was a huge step in the right direction, but it’s now up to the government and regulators to get it right.

“We will be checking carefully that the Online Safety Bill goes far enough in protecting consumers from fake and fraudulent adverts, and it’s vital that the government swiftly introduces the right legislation for bank transfer fraud that will ensure victims get fair and consistent treatment.”

ENDS

Case study

  • Jonny Yeoman, a 27-year-old musician and music teacher from London, was conned out of £2,500 after being tricked into paying a deposit to a fake landlord to secure a rental property in 2018.
  • The victim saw the Clapham property advertised on Gumtree with a link to SpareRoom, and received a message from who he thought was the landlord.
  • The scammer then convinced the victim to set up a viewing at the property with legitimate estate agents, but warned that the estate agents wanted to sell the flat rather than let it out short term.
  • After viewing the flat, Jonny checked the Land Registry to verify the property’s landlord and decided to put down a deposit.
  • When Jonny tried to move in, the real landlord’s daughter answered the door and said they had no knowledge of the rental agreement and realised the landlord’s email was fake.
  • Jonny reported the scam to Action Fraud and the recipient bank of the deposit, which was able to recover almost all of the money lost.

Notes to editors

Background

  • Which? analysed data collated by Action Fraud, the fraud and cybercrime reporting centre for England, Wales and Northern Ireland, between November 2020 and December 2021.
  • Police Scotland records its own fraud data but if victims who contact Action Fraud live in Scotland, or the fraud occurs in Scotland, this will be recorded and sent onto Police Scotland to be investigated. This analysis includes 8,823 reports that were passed to Police Scotland.

12 emerging fraud threats

Fraud type

Reports

Average loss

Online shopping/auction scams (+14%)

103,814

£650

Other advance fee fraud (+15%)

36,108

£1,296

Shopping fraud excl online (+14%)

24,822

£2,692

Computer fixing fraud (+24%)

19,384

£1,448

Other investment fraud (+34%)

15,656

£24,089

Dating scams (+39%)

10,224

£10,349

Boiler room scams (+57%)

7,561

£24,887

Rental fraud (+11%)

5,084

£1,531

Phone fraud (+48%)

4,969

£252

Pyramid/Ponzi schemes (+59%)

3,168

£50,429

Fraud recovery scams (+33%)

2,763

£17,598

‘419’ advance fee fraud (+61%)

2,523

£2,563

Table notes:

  • Which? has focused on 12 emerging fraud threats facing individuals (not organisations).
  • Reports and average loss based on analysis of Action Fraud reports collated between November 2020 and December 2021.
  • Figures in brackets show year-on-year change in number of incidents, based on Action Fraud figures reported in the latest ONS Crime survey for England and Wales, comparing the periods Oct 2019-Sept 2020 and Oct 2020-Sept 2021.
  • Which? has altered the names of two fraud types (Action Fraud records ‘shopping fraud excl online’ as ‘other consumer non investment fraud’ and ‘computer fixing fraud’ as ‘computer software service fraud’).
About Which?

Which? is the UK’s consumer champion, here to make life simpler, fairer and safer for everyone. Our research gets to the heart of consumer issues, our advice is impartial, and our rigorous product tests lead to expert recommendations. We’re the independent consumer voice that influences politicians and lawmakers, investigates, holds businesses to account and makes change happen. As an organisation we’re not for profit and all for making consumers more powerful.

The information in this press release is for editorial use by journalists and media outlets only. Any business seeking to reproduce information in this release should contact the Which? Endorsement Scheme team at endorsementscheme@which.co.uk.

Press Release: , , ,